Số 232 | Tháng 7/2025
Các yếu tố tác động đến hành vi đổi mới của nhân viên: Tổng quan lý thuyết và đề xuất mô hình nghiên cứu
Huỳnh Đăng Khoa, Nguyễn Văn Thụy
Hành vi đổi mới
lãnh đạo toàn diện
chia sẻ tri thức
tinh thần tại nơi làm việc
hệ thống hiệu suất cao.
Tóm tắt:
Trong môi trường kinh doanh nhiều biến động, hành vi đổi mới (HVĐM) của nhân viên được xem là yếu tố then chốt giúp tổ chức nâng cao hiệu suất và duy trì lợi thế cạnh tranh. Các nghiên cứu trước đây đã chỉ ra rằng phong cách lãnh đạo toàn diện (PCLĐTD), hệ thống hiệu suất cao (HTHSC) và tinh thần tại nơi làm việc (TTTNLV) đều có tác động cùng chiều đến HVĐM. Tuy nhiên, phần lớn chỉ tiếp cận theo hướng đơn lẻ, thiếu các mô hình tích hợp làm rõ cơ chế tác động tổng thể. Nghiên cứu này phát triển một mô hình lý thuyết, trong đó hành vi chia sẻ tri thức (CSTT) giữ vai trò trung gian giữa các yếu tố thuộc môi trường tổ chức với HVĐM của nhân viên. Mô hình được phát triển dựa trên nền tảng lý thuyết về đổi mới sáng tạo cùng những lý thuyết có liên quan, đồng thời kết hợp phân tích tổng hợp các nghiên cứu thực nghiệm bằng phương pháp nghiên cứu hệ thống. Từ đó, cung cấp thêm cơ sở lý thuyết vững chắc cho nghiên cứu thực nghiệm trong tương lai và hàm ý quản trị nhằm thúc đẩy HVĐM ở tổ chức.
Tài liệu tham khảo:
- Afsar, B., & Rehman, M. (2015). The relationship between workplace spirituality and innovative work behavior: The mediating role of perceived person–organization fit. Journal of management, spirituality & religion, 12(4), 329-353. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2015.1060515
- Akram, T., Lei, S., Haider, M. J., & Hussain, S. T. (2020). The impact of organizational justice on employee innovative work behavior: Mediating role of knowledge sharing. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(2), 117-129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.10.001
- AlEssa, H. S., & Durugbo, C. M. (2022). Systematic review of innovative work behavior concepts and contributions. Management Review Quarterly, 72(4), 1171-1208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00224-x
- Alpkan, L., & Gemici, E. (2023). The relation between high-performance work systems and product innovativeness: The mediating role of technological capabilities and the moderating role of university-industry collaboration. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 67, 101735. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2023.101735
- Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 10(1), 123-167.
- Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in organizational behavior, 36, 157-183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001
- Anser, M. K., Yousaf, Z., Yasir, M., Sharif, M., Nasir, M. H., Rasheed, M. I., Waheed, J., Hussain, H., & Majid, A. (2022). How to unleash innovative work behavior of SMEs' workers through knowledge sharing? Accessing functional flexibility as a mediator. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(1), 233-248. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2019-0332
- Appelbaum, E. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. Cornell University Press.
- Ashmos, D. P., & Duchon, D. (2000). Spirituality at work: A conceptualization and measure. Journal of management inquiry, 9(2), 134-145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/105649260092008
- Asurakkody, T. A., & Kim, S. H. (2020). Effect of knowledge sharing behavior on innovative work behavior among nursing students: Mediating role of self-leadership. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2020.100190
- Baber, P., Baber, R., & Di Virgilio, F. (2023). Exploring the relationship between workplace spirituality, spiritual survival and innovative work behavior among healthcare professionals. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 1-12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/20479700.2023.2199555
- Bantha, T., & Nayak, U. (2020). The relation of workplace spirituality with employees’ innovative work behaviour: the mediating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Indian Business Research, 13(2), 223-235. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-03-2020-0067
- Battistelli, A., Odoardi, C., Vandenberghe, C., Di Napoli, G., & Piccione, L. (2019). Information sharing and innovative work behavior: The role of work‐based learning, challenging tasks, and organizational commitment. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 30(3), 361-381. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21344
- Bawuro, F. A., Shamsuddin, A., Wahab, E., & Usman, H. (2019). Mediating role of meaningful work in the relationship between intrinsic motivation and innovative work behaviour. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(9), 2076-2084.
- Bhatti, S. H., Zakariya, R., Vrontis, D., Santoro, G., & Christofi, M. (2021). High-performance work systems, innovation and knowledge sharing: An empirical analysis in the context of project-based organizations. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 43(2), 438-458. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-10-2019-0403
- Caniëls, M. C., & Veld, M. (2019). Employee ambidexterity, high performance work systems and innovative work behaviour: How much balance do we need? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(4), 565-585. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1216881
- Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250-260. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.504654
- Chen, L., Liu, Y., Hu, S., & Zhang, S. (2022). Perception of organizational politics and innovative behavior in the workplace: The roles of knowledge-sharing hostility and mindfulness. Journal of Business Research, 145, 268-276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.006
- Combs, J., Liu, Y., Hall, A., & Ketchen, D. (2006). How much do high‐performance work practices matter? A meta‐analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Personnel psychology, 59(3), 501-528. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00045.x
- De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Innovative work behavior: Measurement and validation. EIM Business and Policy Research, 8(1), 1-27.
- Do, H., & Shipton, H. (2019). High-performance work systems and innovation in Vietnamese small firms. International Small Business Journal, 37(7), 732-753. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242619863572
- Escribá-Carda, N., Balbastre-Benavent, F., & Canet-Giner, M. T. (2017). Employees' perceptions of high-performance work systems and innovative behaviour: The role of exploratory learning. European Management Journal, 35(2), 273-281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.11.002
- Garg, N., & Saini, D. (2023). Workplace spirituality to cultivate innovative work behaviour: the moderating role of perceived working conditions. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-03-2023-0050
- Gibbert, M., & Krause, H. (2002). Practice exchange in a best practice marketplace. Knowledge management case book: Siemens best practices, 89-105.
- Grošelj, M., Černe, M., Penger, S., & Grah, B. (2021). Authentic and transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour: the moderating role of psychological empowerment. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(3), 677-706. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2019-0294
- Guthrie, J. P., Flood, P. C., Liu, W., & MacCurtain, S. (2009). High performance work systems in Ireland: human resource and organizational outcomes. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(1), 112-125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190802528433
- Hoegl, M., Parboteeah, K. P., & Munson, C. L. (2003). Team‐level antecedents of individuals' knowledge networks. Decision Sciences, 34(4), 741-770. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5414.2003.02344.x
- Hollander, E. P. (2013). Inclusive leadership and idiosyncrasy credit in leader-follower relations. The Oxford handbook of leadership, 122-143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398793.013.0009
- Hughes, D. J., Lee, A., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Legood, A. (2018). Leadership, creativity, and innovation: A critical review and practical recommendations. The leadership quarterly, 29(5), 549-569. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.03.001
- Hunsaker, W. D., & Ding, W. (2022). Workplace spirituality and innovative work behavior: the role of employee flourishing and workplace satisfaction. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 44(6), 1355-1371. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-01-2021-0032
- Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management journal, 38(3), 635-672. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/256741
- Javed, B., Naqvi, S. M. M. R., Khan, A. K., Arjoon, S., & Tayyeb, H. H. (2017). Impact of inclusive leadership on innovative work behavior: The role of psychological safety. Journal of Management & Organization, 25(1), 117-136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.3
- Kakakhel, F. J., & Khalil, S. H. (2022). Deciphering the black box of HPWS–innovation link: Modeling the mediatory role of internal social capital. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 6(2), 78-91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2022.04.004
- Kinjerski, V., & Skrypnek, B. J. (2006). A human ecological model of spirit at work. Journal of management, spirituality & religion, 3(3), 231-241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14766080609518627
- Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization science, 3(3), 383-397. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.383
- Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person‐organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel psychology, 49(1), 1-49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.x
- Mansoor, A., Farrukh, M., Wu, Y., & Abdul Wahab, S. (2021). Does inclusive leadership incite innovative work behavior? Human Systems Management, 40(1), 93-102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-200972
- Michaelis, B., Wagner, J. D., & Schweizer, L. (2015). Knowledge as a key in the relationship between high-performance work systems and workforce productivity. Journal of Business Research, 68(5), 1035-1044. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.10.005
- Morinaga, Y., Sato, Y., Hayashi, S., & Shimanuki, T. (2023). Inclusive leadership and knowledge sharing in Japanese workplaces: the role of diversity in the biological sex of workplace personnel. Personnel Review, 52(5), 1405-1419. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2021-0111
- Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization science, 5(1), 14-37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
- Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage publications.
- Phong, N. Đ. (2019). Phong cách lãnh đạo toàn diện và sự đổi mới của nhóm: vai trò của sự chia sẻ kiến thức trong nhóm và môi trường đổi mới trong tổ chức. Tạp chí nghiên cứu Kinh tế và Kinh doanh Châu Á.
- Phung, V. D., Hawryszkiewycz, I., & Chandran, D. (2019). How knowledge sharing leads to innovative work behaviour: A moderating role of transformational leadership. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 21(3), 277-303. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-11-2018-0148
- Qi, L., Liu, B., Wei, X., & Hu, Y. (2019). Impact of inclusive leadership on employee innovative behavior: Perceived organizational support as a mediator. PloS one, 14(2), e0212091. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212091
- Radaelli, G., Lettieri, E., Mura, M., & Spiller, N. (2014). Knowledge sharing and innovative work behaviour in healthcare: A micro‐level investigation of direct and indirect effects. Creativity and innovation management, 23(4), 400-414. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12084
- Rahman, M. S., Osman-Gani, A. M., Momen, M. A., & Islam, N. (2015). Testing knowledge sharing effectiveness: trust, motivation, leadership style, workplace spirituality and social network embedded model. Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 10(4), 284-303. https://doi.org/10.1515/mmcks-2015-0019
- Randel, A. E., Galvin, B. M., Shore, L. M., Ehrhart, K. H., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., & Kedharnath, U. (2018). Inclusive leadership: Realizing positive outcomes through belongingness and being valued for uniqueness. Human resource management review, 28(2), 190-203. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.07.002
- Roberson, Q., & Perry, J. L. (2022). Inclusive leadership in thought and action: A thematic analysis. Group & Organization Management, 47(4), 755-778. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011211013161
- Salem, N. H., Ishaq, M. I., Yaqoob, S., Raza, A., & Zia, H. (2023). Employee engagement, innovative work behaviour, and employee wellbeing: Do workplace spirituality and individual spirituality matter? Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 32(2), 657-669. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12463
- Shakil, R. M., Memon, M. A., & Ting, H. (2021). Inclusive leadership and innovative work behaviour: the mediating role of job autonomy. Quality & quantity, 1-15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01102-0
- Singh, R. K., & Singh, S. (2022). Spirituality in the workplace: a systematic review. Management Decision, 60(5), 1296-1325. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2020-1466
- Smith, A. D., & Rupp, W. T. (2003). Knowledge workers: exploring the link among performance rating, pay and motivational aspects. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 107-124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270310463662
- Sơn, Đ. B. (2022). Chia sẻ tri thức và hành vi làm việc đổi mới của nhân viên trong ngành hàng không. Tạp chí khoa học đại học Mở Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh-kinh tế và quản trị kinh doanh, 17(3), 36-49. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.vi.17.3.1871.2022
- Sơn, Đ. B. (2023). Knowledge sharing, intellectual capital and employee innovative behavior: A study of information technology industry in Ho Chi Minh City. VNUHCM Journal of Economics, Business and Law, 7(1), 4142-4153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32508/stdjelm.v7i1.1144
- Sorakraikitikul, M., & Siengthai, S. (2014). Organizational learning culture and workplace spirituality: Is knowledge-sharing behaviour a missing link? The learning organization, 21(3), 175-192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-08-2011-0046
- Sürücü, L., Maslakçı, A., & Şeşen, H. (2023). Inclusive leadership and innovative work behaviors: a moderated mediation model. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 44(1), 87-102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-05-2022-0227
- Taştan, S., & İŞİAÇIK, S. (2021). Reassessing innovative work behaviors during COVID-19 pandemic: the impacts of workplace spirituality and psychological safety perception. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(2), 537-555. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.736610
- Tenney, E. R., Poole, J. M., & Diener, E. (2016). Does positivity enhance work performance?: Why, when, and what we don’t know. Research in organizational behavior, 36, 27-46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.11.002
- Tran Huy, P. (2023). High-performance work system and knowledge hoarding: the mediating role of competitive climate and the moderating role of high-performance work system psychological contract breach. International Journal of Manpower, 44(1), 77-94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-06-2021-0331
- Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British journal of management, 14(3), 207-222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
- Yasir, M., Majid, A., Yousaf, Z., Nassani, A. A., & Haffar, M. (2023). An integrative framework of innovative work behavior for employees in SMEs linking knowledge sharing, functional flexibility and psychological empowerment. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(2), 289-308. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2021-0091
- Ye, Q., Wang, D., & Guo, W. (2019). Inclusive leadership and team innovation: The role of team voice and performance pressure. European Management Journal, 37(4), 468-480. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.01.006
- Yoo, S., Joo, B.-K., & Noh, J. H. (2022). Team emergent states and team effectiveness: the roles of inclusive leadership and knowledge sharing. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 9(3), 353-371. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-05-2021-0120
- Zheng, J., Liu, H., & Zhou, J. (2020). High-performance work systems and open innovation: moderating role of IT capability. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 120(8), 1441-1457. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2019-0475
Factors Influencing Employee Innovative Behavior: A Literature Review and Conceptual Model
Innovative work behaviour
inclusive leadership
knowledge sharing
high performance work systems
workplace spirituality.
Abstract:
In a volatile business environment, innovative work behaviour (IWB) is considered a key factor for organisations to improve performance and maintain competitive advantage. Although prior studies have demonstrated the positive effects of inclusive leadership, high-performance work systems (HPWS), and workplace spirituality on IWB, the majority have employed fragmented approaches that examine these relationships in isolation. Based on theories of innovation and relevant behavioural theories, as well as the analysis and synthesis of empirical studies using a systematic research method, this study develops a theoretical model in which knowledge sharing (KS) mediates the relationship between organisational environmental factors and employee innovation behaviour. The study provides a theoretical framework for future empirical research and offers managerial implications to promote the implementation of IWB within organisations.