Tóm tắt:
Mục tiêu nghiên cứu: Bài viết này kiểm định tác động của sự quan tâm đến môi trường (EC) đến ý định khởi nghiệp xanh (GEI) thông qua hai biến trung gian: Nhận thức kiểm soát hành vi (PBC) và trách nhiệm đạo đức (MO). Bài nghiên cứu dựa trên sự tích hợp giữa lý thuyết Hành vi có kế hoạch và mô hình kích hoạt chuẩn mực.
Thiết kế nghiên cứu/phương pháp/tiếp cận: Dữ liệu được thu thập từ khảo sát 245 sinh viên đại học tại Việt Nam và được phân tích bằng PLS-SEM.
Kết quả nghiên cứu chính: EC có ảnh hưởng cùng chiều đến cả PBC và MO; hai yếu tố này đều có tác động đáng kể đến GEI, trong đó MO thể hiện ảnh hưởng mạnh hơn. Sự phân tích trung gian cho thấy EC có ảnh hưởng gián tiếp đến GEI thông qua cả hai kênh nhận thức và đạo đức, với kênh đạo đức chiếm ưu thế.
Giá trị đóng góp: Nghiên cứu làm rõ cơ chế tác động kép giữa nhận thức và đạo đức trong mối quan hệ giữa EC và GEI, đồng thời cung cấp bằng chứng thực nghiệm mới tại Việt Nam, góp phần củng cố tính khái quát của mô hình tích hợp. Hàm ý thực tiễn nhấn mạnh tầm quan trọng của việc phát triển MO và củng cố PBC thông qua giáo dục, đào tạo và chính sách hỗ trợ. Tuy nhiên, nghiên cứu còn giới hạn bởi mẫu thuận tiện và dữ liệu cắt ngang.
Tài liệu tham khảo:
- Aga, M. K. (2023). The mediating role of perceived behavioral control in the relationship between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intentions of university students in Ethiopia. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00297-w
- Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
- Al-Mamary, Y. H. (2025). Factors shaping green entrepreneurial intentions towards green innovation: an integrated model. Future Business Journal, 11(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00443-8.
- Amankwah, J., & Sesen, H. (2021). On the relation between green entrepreneurship intention and behavior. Sustainability, 13(13), 7474. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137474.
- Chan, K. H., Chong, L. L., & Ng, T. H. (2022). Integrating extended theory of planned behaviour and norm activation model to examine the effects of environmental practices among Malaysian companies. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 14(5), 851-873. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-08-2021-0317.
- Confente, I., & Scarpi, D. (2021). Achieving environmentally responsible behavior for tourists and residents: A norm activation theory perspective. Journal of Travel Research, 60(6), 1196-1212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520938875.
- Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.
- Hariram, N. P., Mekha, K. B., Suganthan, V., & Sudhakar, K. (2023). Sustainalism: An integrated socio-economic-environmental model to address sustainable development and sustainability. Sustainability, 15(13), 10682. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310682.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.
- Hockerts, K. (2017). Determinants of social entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 41(1), 105-130. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12171.
- Jun, M., Ariyesti, F. R., Ali, S., & Xiaobao, P. (2023). The effect of effectuation and causation approach on entrepreneurial orientation in the presence of leader dominance and self-efficacy. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 15(4), 835-858. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-07-2021-0286.
- Kilbourne, W., & Pickett, G. (2008). How materialism affects environmental beliefs, concern, and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of business research, 61(9), 885-893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.09.016.
- Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
- Kock, N. (2017). Common method bias: a full collinearity assessment method for PLS-SEM. In Partial least squares path modeling: Basic concepts, methodological issues and applications (pp. 245-257). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_11.
- Kotyza, P., Cabelkova, I., Pierański, B., Malec, K., Borusiak, B., Smutka, L., ... & Hlaváček, M. (2024). The predictive power of environmental concern, perceived behavioral control and social norms in shaping pro-environmental intentions: a multicountry study. Frontiers in ecology and evolution, 12, 1289139. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2024.1289139.
- Le, T. N. P., Nguyen, K. H., & Nguyen, N. T. H. (2023). How environmental understanding affects the green entrepreneurial intention of Centennials in Vietnam. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 11(4), 123-137. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2023.110408.
- Liñán, F., & Chen, Y. W. (2009). Development and cross–cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 33(3), 593-617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00318.x.
- Naparin, M. (2025). The role of TPBF, perceived moral obligation and green intention on pro-environmental behavior and environmental sustainability of wetland MSMEs with an environmental-based view approach for green business. Cogent Social Sciences, 11(1), 2488115. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2488115.
- Naparin, M., & Astuti, W. T. (2025). Innovative green consumption in a manufacturing company in the environmental-based view approach: the role of moral obligation, TPBF, green intention and pro-environmental behavior with the moderating effect of innovative work environment. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1), 2440118. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2440118.
- Ogiemwonyi, O., & Jan, M. T. (2023). The correlative influence of consumer ethical beliefs, environmental ethics, and moral obligation on green consumption behavior. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances, 19, 200171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2023.200171.
- Pham, M., Lam, B. Q., & Le, V. P. T. (2023). The e-entrepreneurial intention of students: The role of self-efficacy and education. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 11(1), 127-143. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2023.110107.
- Pham, M., Lam, B. Q., Nguyen, A. T. T., Dinh, T. K. T., & Tran, H. Y. (2024). How do environment and innovativeness affect digital entrepreneurial intention through education? An explanation from the social cognitive career theory. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, 101179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101179.
- Purwanto, A., & Sudargini, Y. (2021). Partial least squares structural squation modeling (PLS-SEM) analysis for social and management research: a literature review. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research, 2(4), 114-123. https://doi.org/10.7777/jiemar.v2i4.168
- Qazi, W., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., Khan, K. A., & Qureshi, M. A. (2021). Impact of personality traits and university green entrepreneurial support on students' green entrepreneurial intentions: the moderating role of environmental values. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(4), 1154-1180. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-05-2020-0130.
- Quyên, N. L. H. T. T., Hảo, T. Y., & Bảo, L. Q. (2024). Khám phá mối quan hệ giữa nhận thức kiểm soát hành vi và ý định khởi nghiệp của sinh viên-Vai trò trung gian của định hướng khởi nghiệp. Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Mở Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh–Kinh Tế Và Quản Trị Kinh Doanh, 19(12), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.vi.19.12.3378.2024.
- Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. Advances in experimental social psychology, 10, 221-279.
- Sharma, L., Bulsara, H. P., Trivedi, M., & Bagdi, H. (2024). An analysis of sustainability-driven entrepreneurial intentions among university students: the role of university support and SDG knowledge. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(2), 281-301. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-11-2022-0359.
- Shepherd, D. A., & Patzelt, H. (2011). The new field of sustainable entrepreneurship: Studying entrepreneurial action linking “what is to be sustained” with “what is to be developed”. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 35(1), 137-163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00426.x.
- Tran, H. Y., Vo, T. M. T., Doan, N. N., Huynh, D. M. T., Lam, B. Q., & Pham, M. (2025). The role of environmental concern and sustainable development goals knowledge for sustainable entrepreneurial intention. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01698-5.
- Ukil, M. I., Almashayekhi, A., & Ullah, M. S. (2024). Feeling compassion and responsible but not starting a social venture: Role of empathy and moral obligation in social entrepreneurial intention. Society and Business Review, 19(1), 132-154. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-09-2022-0227.
- Vamvaka, V., Stoforos, C., Palaskas, T., & Botsaris, C. (2020). Attitude toward entrepreneurship, perceived behavioral control, and entrepreneurial intention: dimensionality, structural relationships, and gender differences. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 9(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-020-0112-0.
- Wahyono, T., Satriyo, F. R., & Andriyani, A. (2024). The role of green entrepreneurial intention in shaping green entrepreneurial behavior: A literature review. Research Horizon, 4(4), 35-46. https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.4.4.2024.302.
- Wang, W., Cao, Q., Zhuo, C., Mou, Y., Pu, Z., & Zhou, Y. (2021). COVID-19 to green entrepreneurial intention: Role of green entrepreneurial self-efficacy, optimism, ecological values, social responsibility, and green entrepreneurial motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 732904. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.732904.
- Wibowo, A., Widjaja, S. U. M., Utomo, S. H., Kusumojanto, D. D., Wardoyo, C., Wardana, L. W., & Narmaditya, B. S. (2022). Does Islamic values matter for Indonesian students’ entrepreneurial intention? The mediating role of entrepreneurial inspiration and attitude. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 13(2), 242-263. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-03-2021-0090.
- Xu, G., Hou, G., & Zhang, J. (2022). Digital Sustainable Entrepreneurship: A digital capability perspective through digital innovation orientation for social and environmental value creation. Sustainability, 14(18), 11222. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811222.
- Yasir, N., Babar, M., Mehmood, H. S., Xie, R., & Guo, G. (2023). The environmental values play a role in the development of green entrepreneurship to achieve sustainable entrepreneurial intention. Sustainability, 15(8), 6451. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086451.
- Youssef, A. B., Boubaker, S., & Omri, A. (2018). Entrepreneurship and sustainability: The need for innovative and institutional solutions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129, 232-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.003.
Abstract:
Purpose: This study examines the effect of environmental concern on green entrepreneurial intention through two mediating variables: perceived behavioral control and moral obligation, based on the integration of the theory of planned behavior and the norm activation model.
Design/methodology/approach: Data were collected from a survey of 245 university students in Vietnam and analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling.
Findings: Environmental concern positively influences both perceived behavioral control and moral obligation; both factors significantly affect green entrepreneurial intention, with moral obligation showing a stronger impact. Mediation analysis reveals that environmental concern indirectly affects green entrepreneurial intention through both cognitive and moral pathways, with the moral route being dominant.
Originality/value: The study clarifies the dual mechanism linking environmental concern and green entrepreneurial intention through cognitive and moral dimensions. It also provides empirical evidence from Vietnam, enhancing the generalizability of the integrated model that combines behavioral and moral factors. Practical implications highlight the need to foster moral responsibility while simultaneously strengthening perceived behavioral control through education, training, and supportive policies. However, the study is limited by its convenience sampling and cross-sectional data.