Số 238 | Tháng 01/2026
Ảnh hưởng của khả năng cạnh tranh thị trường sản phẩm đến hiệu quả hoạt động doanh nghiệp niêm yết tại Việt Nam
Vương Thị Hương Giang, Hà Văn Côi
Tóm tắt:
Mục tiêu nghiên cứu: Nghiên cứu đánh giá khả năng cạnh tranh thị trường (CTTT) sản phẩm đến hiệu quả hoạt động (HQHĐ) của các doanh nghiệp ngành sản xuất tại Việt Nam dựa trên khung lý thuyết Cấu trúc – Hành vi – Hiệu quả (SCP).
Thiết kế nghiên cứu/phương pháp/tiếp cận: Bài viết phân tích dữ liệu từ 275 doanh nghiệp niêm yết (DNNY) trên thị trường chứng khoán (TTCK) Việt Nam với 3.575 mẫu quan sát trong giai đoạn 2011–2023, thông qua các phương pháp ước lượng cho dữ liệu bảng, hiệu ứng ngẫu nhiên (REM), hiệu ứng cố định (FEM) và ước lượng tổng quát của các khoảnh khắc hệ thống (SGMM).
Kết quả nghiên cứu chính: Kết quả đạt được đồng thuận cho thấy các doanh nghiệp tại Việt Nam có khả năng CTTT sản phẩm cao có xu hướng đạt được HQHĐ vượt trội hơn các doanh nghiệp có khả năng CTTT sản phẩm thấp.
Giá trị đóng góp mới: Nghiên cứu cung cấp bằng chứng thực nghiệm củng cố cho khung lý thuyết SCP trong bối cảnh Việt Nam; đồng thời, đề xuất các hàm ý chính sách nhằm cải thiện HQHĐ doanh nghiệp từ góc độ gia tăng khả năng CTTT sản phẩm của chính công ty.
Tài liệu tham khảo:
- Alarussi, A. S. A. (2021). Financial ratios and efficiency in Malaysian listed companies. Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, 5(2), 116-135. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEB-06-2020-0014.
- Bain, J. S. (1951). Relation of Profit Rate to Industry Concentration: American Manufacturing, 1936-1940. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 65(3), 293-324. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882217.
- Bain, J. S. (1968). Industrial organization (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley
- Boamah, N. A., Boakye-Dankwa, A., & Opoku, E. (2022). Risk-taking behavior, competition, diversification, and performance of frontier and emerging economy banks. Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, 6(1), 50-68. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEB-04-2021-0047.
- Bourai, S., Arora, R., & Yadav, N. (2024). Structure-conduct-performance (SCP) paradigm in digital platform competition: a conceptual framework. Journal of Strategy and Management, 17(2), 322-347. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-07-2023-0184.
- Bộ Công Thương. (2024). 18 năm Việt Nam gia nhập WTO: Bước ngoặt lớn thúc đẩy tăng trưởng xuất khẩu, thu hút FDI. Công Thương. Truy cập 10/02/2025, từ https://congthuong.vn/18-nam-viet-nam-gia-nhap-wto-buoc-ngoat-lon-thuc-day-tang-truong-xuat-khau-thu-hut-fdi-357369.html
- Chakraborty, I. (2023). Uncovering heterogeneity in the relationship between competition, corporate governance, and firm performance using quantile regression on Indian data. Asia and the Global Economy, 3(2), 100066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aglobe.2023.100066.
- Chang, C. C., Yang, H., & Hsu, K. Z. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and product market power. Economies, 10(6), 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10060151.
- Charles, M., & Ochieng, S. B. (2023). Strategic outsourcing and firm performance: a review of literature. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research (IJSSHR) ISSN, 2959-7056. https://doi.org/10.61108/ijsshr.v1i1.5.
- Chhaochharia, V., Grinstein, Y., Grullon, G., & Michaely, R. (2017). Product market competition and internal governance: Evidence from the Sarbanes–Oxley Act. Management Science, 63(5), 1405-1424. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2409.
- Dai, Z., & Guo, L. (2020). Market competition and corporate performance: Empirical evidence from China listed banks with financial monopoly aspect. Applied Economics, 52(44), 4822-4833. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2020.1745749.
- Dossa, J. V., Gopang, A. A., Thomas, D., & Ukwuoma, C. C. (2025). Does the bank’s nature heterogeneity matter? Environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance and corporate profitability. Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, 9(3), 364-394. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEB-11-2024-0128.
- Duong, K. D., Dang, H. G., Tran, T. N. D., & Pham, H. (2024). How do financial constraints and market competition affect innovations: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100321.
- Fiegenbaum, A., & Thomas, H. (1995). Strategic groups as reference groups: Theory, modeling and empirical examination of industry and competitive strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 16(6), 461-476. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160605.
- Huỳnh Lợi, & Phùng Anh Thư. (2022). Tác động của cạnh tranh ngành đến hiệu quả hoạt động tại các doanh nghiệp niêm yết trên thị trường chứng khoán Việt Nam. Kinh tế và Quản trị kinh doanh, 118-130.
- Javeed, S. A., Latief, R., & Lefen, L. (2020). An analysis of relationship between environmental regulations and firm performance with moderating effects of product market competition: Empirical evidence from Pakistan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120197.
- Januszewski, S. I., Köke, J., Winter, J. K. (2002). Product market competition, corporate governance and firm performance: an empirical analysis for Germany. Research in Economics, 56 (3), 299-332. https://doi.org/10.1006/reec.2001.0278.
- Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2005). The office of strategy management. Harvard Business Review, 83(10), 72.
- Kim, I., Lee, S., & Sharma, B. (2023). Competition law reform and firm performance: Evidence from developing countries. Emerging Markets Review, 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2023.101050.
- King, M. R., & Santor, E. (2008). Family values: Ownership structure, performance, and capital structure of Canadian firms. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(11), 2423-2432. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBANKFIN.2008.02.002.
- Liu, Q., Qu, X., Wang, D., Abbas, J., & Mubeen, R. (2022). Product market competition and firm performance: business survival through innovation and entrepreneurial orientation amid COVID-19 financial crisis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 790923. https://doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.790923.
- Mitani, H. (2020). Predation risk, market power, and cash policy. Managerial Finance, 46(7), 897-911. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-05-2019-0222.
- Moradi, M., Bagherpour Velashani, M. A., & Omidfar, M. (2017). Corporate governance, product market competition, and firm performance: evidence from Iran. Humanomics, 33(1), 38-55. https://doi.org/10.1108/H-10-2016-0075.
- Mubeen, R., Han, D., Abbas, J., & Hussain, I. (2020). The effects of market competition, capital structure, and CEO duality on firm performance: A mediation analysis by incorporating the GMM model technique. Sustainability, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12083480.
- Ngo, M. T., Le, T. N., Nguyen, N. T., & Luu, T. T. T. (2023). Board Independence and Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence on Mediating Role of Market Competition From the Vietnamese Market. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(5), e01498. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i5.1498.
- Pant, M., & Pattanayak, M. (2010). Corporate governance, competition, and firm performance: Evidence from India. Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 9(3), 347-381. https://doi.org/10.1177/097265271000900305.
- Porter, M. (1990). Competitive Advantage of Nations. Competitive Intelligence Review, 1(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1002/cir.3880010112.
- Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. van der. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97.
- Sheikh, S. (2018). CEO power, product market competition, and firm value. Research in International Business and Finance, 46, 373-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2018.04.009.
- Stigler, G. J. (1958). The economies of scale. The Journal of Law and Economics, 1, 54-71. https://doi.org/10.1086/466541.
- Spierdijk, L., & Zaouras, M. (2017). The Lerner index and revenue maximization. Applied Economics Letters, 24(15), 1075-1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2016.1254333.
- Tuyet, N. L. H., & Ninh, L. K. (2023). Competition and firm performance: evidence from Vietnam. RAUSP Management Journal, 58(2), 111-124. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-03-2022-0094.
- Trần Quốc Việt. (2023). Hội nhập kinh tế quốc tế của Việt Nam giai đoạn 2011 – 2022: Nhìn từ quá trình triển khai đổi mới tư duy của Đảng. Tạp chí Cộng sản. Truy cập 10/02/2025, từ https://tapchicongsan.org.vn/web/guest/nghien-cu/-/2018/827613/hoi-nhap-kinh-te-quoc-te-cua-viet-nam-giai-doan-2011---2022--nhin-tu-qua-trinh-trien-khai-doi-moi-tu-duy-cua-dang.aspx.
- Wulandari, F. I., & Soesetio, Y. (2024). Market Concentration and Firm Performance of Manufacturing Companies. In BISTIC Business Innovation Sustainability and Technology International Conference, 23-31. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-576-8_4.
- Xuan Ha, T., & Thi Tran, T. (2022). The impact of product market competition on firm performance through the mediating of corporate governance index: empirical of listed companies in Vietnam. Cogent Business and Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2129356.
- Yıldız, H., Köprücü, Y., & Şengül, S. (2024). Assessing competition in the Turkish cement industry: insights from the Boone indicator. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-10-2023-0280.
Impact of Product Market Competitiveness on Performance of Listed Enterprises in Vietnam
Abstract:
Purpose: This study examines the impact of product market competitiveness (PMC) on firm performance (FP) of manufacturing enterprises in Vietnam, grounded in the Structure–Conduct–Performance (SCP) theoretical framework.
Design/methodology/approach: The paper analyzes panel data from 275 listed firms on the Vietnamese stock market, comprising 3,575 firm-year observations over the period 2011–2023. Panel data estimation techniques are employed, including the Random Effects Model (REM), Fixed Effects Model (FEM), and the System Generalized Method of Moments (SGMM).
Findings: The results consistently indicate that firms with higher levels of product market competitiveness tend to achieve superior performance compared to firms with lower competitiveness.
Originality/value: The study provides robust empirical evidence supporting the SCP framework in the Vietnamese context and offers policy implications aimed at enhancing firm performance through strengthening firms’ product market competitiveness.