Tóm tắt:
Mục tiêu nghiên cứu: Bài viết khám phá các nhóm chủ đề và xu hướng nghiên cứu nổi bật trong lĩnh vực về chia sẻ tri thức (knowledge sharing – KS) trong giáo dục đại học (higher education – HE). Từ đó, bài viết thực hiện tổng quan tài liệu một cách hệ thống để có cái nhìn tổng quát và đề xuất các hướng nghiên cứu tiềm năng cho chủ đề nổi bật này.
Thiết kế nghiên cứu/phương pháp/tiếp cận: Nghiên cứu được thực hiện thông qua hai phương pháp (phân tích trắc lượng thư mục và tổng quan tài liệu có hệ thống).
Kết quả nghiên cứu chính: Với trắc lượng thư mục, việc phân tích đồng trích dẫn và từ khóa được thực hiện dựa trên cơ sở dữ liệu gồm 762 bài báo từ Web of Science (WOS). Các chủ đề từ phân tích này bao gồm: (i) Các khung khái niệm và đo lường về KS; (ii) Các yếu tố thúc đẩy và rào cản đối với KS; và (iii) Những vấn đề liên quan đến KS. Với tổng quan tài liệu có hệ thống, 59 bài báo được thu thập từ hai cơ sở dữ liệu WOS và Scopus. Các ấn phẩm này được phân tích tổng quan về lý thuyết nền và phương pháp nghiên cứu, thang đo, cũng như tác nhân và kết quả của hành vi KS. Trên cơ sở này, bài viết đề xuất các hướng nghiên cứu tiềm năng trong tương lai.
Giá trị đóng góp mới: Nghiên cứu cung cấp cái nhìn tổng quát về KS trong HE thông qua phân tích trắc lượng thư mục và tổng quan tài liệu có hệ thống.
Tài liệu tham khảo:
- Ahmed, Y. A., Ahmad, M. N., Ahmad, N., & Zakaria, N. H. (2019). Social media for knowledge-sharing: A systematic literature review. Telematics and informatics, 37, 72-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.01.015.
- Al-Kurdi, O., El-Haddadeh, R., & Eldabi, T. (2018). Knowledge sharing in higher education institutions: a systematic review. Journal of enterprise information management, 31(2), 226-246.
- Almuqrin, A., & Mutambik, I. (2021). The explanatory power of social cognitive theory in determining knowledge sharing among Saudi faculty. Plos one, 16(3), e0248275. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248275.
- Alnatsheh, A. Y., Karaatmaca, A. G., & Çavuşoğlu, B. (2023). Intellectual capital and organizational innovation: examining the mediation role of knowledge sharing on the Palestinian universities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 15(4), 3673. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043673.
- Alqahtani, M., Ayentimi, D. T., & Dayaram, K. (2023). HRM practices and academic research output: evidence from universities in Saudi Arabia. Educational Research and Evaluation, 28(4-6), 73-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2023.2261911.
- Alves, R. B., & Pinheiro, P. (2022). Factors influencing tacit knowledge sharing in research groups in higher education institutions. Administrative Sciences, 12(3), 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12030089.
- Anwar, S., & Saraih, U. N. (2024). Digital leadership in the digital era of education: enhancing knowledge sharing and emotional intelligence. International Journal of Educational Management, 38(6), 1581-1611. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-11-2023-0540?urlappend=%3Futm_source%3Dresearchgate.
- Awan, R. U. N., & Ather, T. (2024). The knowledge ties that bind: mediating effect of knowledge management on heads’ leadership and teachers’ performance. Cogent education, 11(1), 2394740. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2394740.
- Bhatti, S. H., Gavurova, B., Ahmed, A., Marcone, M. R., & Santoro, G. (2024). The impact of digital platforms on the creativity of remote workers through the mediating role of explicit and tacit knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(8), 2433-2459. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2023-0682.
- Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G., & Lee, J. N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS quarterly, 87-111. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148669.
- Charband, Y., & Navimipour, N. J. (2018). Knowledge sharing mechanisms in the education: A systematic review of the state of the art literature and recommendations for future research. Kybernetes, 47(7), 1456-1490. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-06-2017-0227.
- Connelly, C. E., & Kelloway, E. K. (2003). Predictors of employees’ perceptions of knowledge sharing cultures. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 24(5), 294-301. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730310485815.
- Connelly, C. E., Zweig, D., Webster, J., & Trougakos, J. P. (2012). Knowledge hiding in organizations. Journal of organizational behavior, 33(1), 64-88. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.737.
- Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of business research, 133, 285-296.
- Enakrire, R. T., & Smuts, H. (2023). Knowledge retention for enhanced organisational growth in Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 22(01), 2250054.
- Farooq, R. (2024). A review of knowledge management research in the past three decades: a bibliometric analysis. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 54(2), 339-378. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-08-2021-0169.
- Fullwood, R., Rowley, J., & Delbridge, R. (2013). Knowledge sharing amongst academics in UK universities. Journal of knowledge management, 17(1), 123-136. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271311300831.
- Goswami, A. K., & Agrawal, R. K. (2023). It’sa knowledge centric world! Does ethical leadership promote knowledge sharing and knowledge creation? Psychological capital as mediator and shared goals as moderator. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(3), 584-612. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2021-0669.
- Ipe, M. (2003). Knowledge sharing in organizations: A conceptual framework. Human resource development review, 2(4), 337-359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484303257985.
- Jia, L., Liang, Z., Lei, C., & Huang, L. (2023). A study on the effects of college students’ knowledge-sharing behavior on group performance and individual social status. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1172554. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1172554.
- Jolaee, A., Md Nor, K., Khani, N., & Md Yusoff, R. (2014). Factors affecting knowledge sharing intention among academic staff. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(4), 413-431. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2013-0041.
- Kazemi, A., Ghasvari, M., Eshlaghi, L. E., Moradi, F., & Molavi, H. (2020). A model for measuring the impact of organisational factors on the effectiveness of the knowledge sharing system. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 19(04), 2050037. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649220500379.
- Kim, S., & Ju, B. (2008). An analysis of faculty perceptions: Attitudes toward knowledge sharing and collaboration in an academic institution. Library & Information Science Research, 30(4), 282-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2008.04.003.
- Kim, S., & Lee, H. (2006). The impact of organizational context and information technology on employee knowledge‐sharing capabilities. Public administration review, 66(3), 370-385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00595.x.
- Lin, C. Y., & Huang, C. K. (2020). Understanding the antecedents of knowledge sharing behaviour and its relationship to team effectiveness and individual learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4549.
- Lin, H. F. (2007). Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions. Journal of information science, 33(2), 135-149.
- Lo, M. F., & Tian, F. (2020). How academic leaders facilitate knowledge sharing: a case of universities in Hong Kong. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(6), 777-798.
- Luc, P. T., Lan, P. X., Le, A. N. H., & Trang, B. T. (2022). A co-citation and co-word analysis of social entrepreneurship research. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 13(3), 324-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2020.1782971.
- Nelson, K. M., & Cooprider, J. G. (1996). The contribution of shared knowledge to IS group performance. MIS quarterly, 409-432.
- Nguyen, D. T., Nguyen, T. N. H., Luu, V. B., Bui, V. K., & Nguyen, T. M. (2024). Self-perceived-employability-of-undergraduate-students-during-the-COVID-19-pandemic: the-role-of-traits, knowledge-sharing-and-trust. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(2), 650-661.
- Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (2007). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard business review, 85(7/8), 162.
- Ramayah, T. Y. J. A., Yeap, J. A., & Ignatius, J. (2013). An empirical inquiry on knowledge sharing among academicians in higher learning institutions. Minerva, 51(2), 131-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-013-9229-7.
- Riege, A. (2005). Three‐dozen knowledge‐sharing barriers managers must consider. Journal of knowledge management, 9(3), 18-35.
- Saragih, L., Nurhayati, M., Salim, N., & Chan, S. (2023). An hierarchical latent variable model of synergistic transformational leadership using pls-sem and its impact on knowledge sharing and sustainability organization performance in private universities. Quality-Access to Success, 24(193).
- Senge, P. (1997). Sharing knowledge: the leader's role is key to a learning culture. Executive excellence, 14, 17-17.
- Shahzad, F., Chilba, S., & Arslan, A. (2024). Tacit knowledge exchange among senior management educators: A qualitative study. The international journal of management education, 22(2), 100973.
- Shamad, M. I., Sari, H., Suti, M., Junaidi, J., & Nurjannah, N. (2023). The Effects of Cognitive-and Affective-Based Trust on Students' Knowledge Sharing and Learning Performance during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 15(2), 303-321.
- Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic management journal, 17(S2), 27-43.
- Tan, C. N. L., & Noor, S. Md. (2013). Knowledge management enablers, knowledge sharing and research collaboration: a study of knowledge management at research universities in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 21(2), 251-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2013.866314.
- Ton, H. N., Shumshunnahar, M., Tu, T. N., & Nguyen, P. T. (2023). Revisiting social capital and knowledge sharing processes in tertiary education: Vietnamese and Bangladeshi students as target populations. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), 2186579. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2186579.
- Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human resource management review, 20(2), 115-131.
- Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS quarterly, 35-57. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148667.
- Wei, C. C., Choy, S. C., Chew, G. G., & Yen, Y. Y. (2012). Knowledge sharing patterns of undergraduate students. Library Review, 61(5), 327-344. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242531211280469.
- Yang, X., & Aumeboonsuke, V. (2024). Influence of Perceived Organizational Support on Innovative Teaching: Insights from University Teachers in Yunnan Province, China. International Journal of Instructional Cases, 8(1), 263-282.
- Yeboah, A. (2023). Knowledge sharing in organization: A systematic review. Cogent business & management, 10(1), 2195027. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2195027.
- Zaheer, M. A. (2025). Developing-an-integrated-model-for-remote-teaching-amelioration-with artificial-intelligence-(AI)-awareness. Quality assurance in Education, 33(2), 283-304. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-04-2024-0060.
Abstract:
Purpose: This study explores thematic clusters and prominent research trends in knowledge sharing (KS) within higher education (HE). Based on these findings, a systematic literature review is conducted to provide an overview and to propose potential future research directions for this emerging field.
Design/methodology/approach: The research employed two approaches: bibliometric analysis and a systematic literature review.
Findings: Bibliometric techniques, including co-citation and keyword analyses, were applied to a dataset of 762 articles from the Web of Science (WOS). The identified thematic clusters include conceptual frameworks and measurement approaches for knowledge sharing (KS), factors affecting KS, and associated issues. For the systematic literature review, 59 articles from WOS and Scopus were analyzed for their theoretical foundations, research methods, measurement scales, and KS behavior's antecedents and outcomes. These analyses led to several proposed avenues for future research.
Originality/value: Provide an overview of knowledge sharing in higher education through bibliometric analysis and systematic review.