Tạp chí đã xuất bản
2004
ISSN
ISSN 2615-9813
ISSN (số cũ) 1859-3682

SỐ 242 | Tháng 5/2026

Tác động của hệ thống hiệu suất cao đến chia sẻ tri thức của nhân viên trong ngành logistics tại Việt Nam

Nguyễn Văn Thụy, Huỳnh Đăng Khoa

Tóm tắt:

Mục tiêu nghiên cứu: Nghiên cứu nhằm kiểm định tác động của các hoạt động quản trị nguồn nhân lực (QTNNL) được tổ chức tích hợp trong hệ thống hiệu suất cao (HTHSC) đến hành vi chia sẻ tri thức (CSTT) trong bối cảnh ngành logistics Việt Nam.
Thiết kế nghiên cứu/phương pháp/tiếp cận: Nghiên cứu định lượng sử dụng dữ liệu khảo sát từ 782 nhân viên doanh nghiệp logistics Việt Nam và phân tích bằng mô hình cấu trúc tuyến tính (SEM)q nhằm kiểm định tác động của các hoạt động QTNNL lên CSTT. 
Kết quả nghiên cứu chính: Các hoạt động QTNNL không tạo tác động tích hợp lên CSTT. Việc tuyển chọn có chọn lọc, đào tạo mở rộng, an ninh việc làm, phần thưởng khuyến khích và sự tham gia của nhân viên có tác động cùng chiều đến CSTT. Ngược lại, thăng tiến nội bộ, mô tả công việc rõ ràng và đánh giá theo định hướng kết quả không có tác động đạt ý nghĩa. 
Giá trị đóng góp mới: Nghiên cứu cung cấp bằng chứng thực nghiệm không phải mọi hoạt động QTNNL đều thúc đẩy CSTT trong cùng cơ chế. Qua đó, nghiên cứu gợi mở định hướng thiết kế HTHSC theo hướng ưu tiên tích hợp các hoạt động trực tiếp thúc đẩy năng lực – động lực – cơ hội để nhân viên chủ động CSTT.

 

Tài liệu tham khảo:

  1. Ahmed, F., Hassan, A., Ayub, M. U., & Klimoski, R. J. (2018). High commitment work system and innovative work behavior: The mediating role of knowledge sharing. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), 12(1), 29-51.
  2. Alfes, K., Veld, M., & Fürstenberg, N. (2021). The relationship between perceived high‐performance work systems, combinations of human resource well‐being and human resource performance attributions and engagement. Human resource management journal, 31(3), 729-752. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12310.
  3. Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2001). Do high performance work systems pay off?. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-2833(01)80022-4.
  4. Arshad, B., Hassan, H., & Azam, A. (2024). The impact of employees’ experience of high-performance work systems on innovative behavior in professional service firms. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1324474. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1324474.
  5. Bae, J., & Lawler, J. J. (2000). Organizational and HRM strategies in Korea: Impact on firm performance in an emerging economy. Academy of Management journal, 43(3), 502-517. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556407.
  6. Bhatti, S. H., Zakariya, R., Vrontis, D., Santoro, G., & Christofi, M. (2021). High-performance work systems, innovation and knowledge sharing: An empirical analysis in the context of project-based organizations. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 43(2), 438-458. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-10-2019-0403.
  7. Blau, P. M. (1964). Social exchange theory. Retrieved September, 3(2007), 62.
  8. Bộ Công Thương. (2023). Báo cáo logistics Việt Nam 2023: Chuyển đổi số trong logistics.
  9. Cabrera, E. F., & Cabrera, A. (2005). Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(5), 720-735. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190500083020.
  10. Cabrera, Á., Collins, W. C & Salgado, J. F. (2006): Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(2), 245-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585190500404614
  11. Delery, J. E., & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management journal, 39(4), 802-835. https://doi.org/10.5465/256713.
  12. Evans, W. R., & Davis, W. D. (2005). High-performance work systems and organizational performance: The mediating role of internal social structure. Journal of management, 31(5), 758-775. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279370.
  13. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104.
  14. Groves, R. M., Fowler Jr, F. J., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2009). Survey methodology (Vol. 561). John Wiley & Sons.
  15. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis. In: Cengage Learning EMEA.
  16. Helmstädter, E. (2003). The institutional economics of knowledge sharing: Basic issues. Chapters, 11-38. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035305018.00010.
  17. Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
  18. Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management journal, 38(3), 635-672. https://doi.org/10.5465/256741.
  19. Jeong, J., Lee, J., & Kim, B.-J. (2024). The relationship between high-performance work system and knowledge sharing behavior via perceived organizational support: the moderating role of coaching leadership. Current Psychology, 43(27), 23082-23102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06051-z.
  20. Jin, S., Pei, J., Nian, P., Lu, W., & Wu, S. (2025). Pay for individual performance and knowledge sharing: A new explanation based on the nonlinear effect. Journal of Business Research, 189, 115161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115161.
  21. Katou, A. A., Budhwar, P. S., & Patel, C. (2014). Content vs. process in the HRM‐performance relationship: An empirical examination. Human Resource Management, 53(4), 527-544. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21606.
  22. Le, H. M., & Le, P. B. (2023). How high-involvement HRM practices motivate knowledge sharing and innovation: the role of market turbulence. Evidence-based HRM: a Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship.
  23. Matošková, J. (2024). The effectiveness of high-commitment human resource practices for employee knowledge sharing. Journal of Management & Organization, 30(6), 1960-1982. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2023.33.
  24. Michaelis, B., Wagner, J. D., & Schweizer, L. (2015). Knowledge as a key in the relationship between high-performance work systems and workforce productivity. Journal of Business Research, 68(5), 1035-1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.10.005.
  25. Nguyen, T.-M., Siri, N. S., & Malik, A. (2022). Multilevel influences on individual knowledge sharing behaviours: the moderating effects of knowledge sharing opportunity and collectivism. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(1), 70-87. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2021-0009.
  26. Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theory 3rd edition (MacGraw-Hill, New York).
  27. Pfohl, H.-C. (2023). Management of the Logistics Function. In Logistics Management: Conception and Functions (pp. 21-44). Springer.
  28. Shujahat, M., Wang, M., Ali, M., Zhu, Q., & Škerlavaj, M. (2025). The dual effects of job design on knowledge hiding: expanding job demands–resources theory to employee rational-choice behaviour. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 36(2), 173-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2024.2442081.
  29. Smith, K. G., Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. (2005). Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms. Academy of Management journal, 48(2), 346-357. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.16928421.
  30. Sun, L.-Y., Aryee, S., & Law, K. S. (2007). High-performance human resource practices, citizenship behavior, and organizational performance: A relational perspective. Academy of Management journal, 50(3), 558-577. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.25525821.
  31. Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2018). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 7). pearson Boston, MA.
  32. Nguyen TD, Cao TH, Nguyen TM, Nguyen TT (2024), Psychological capital: a literature review and research trends. Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, 8(3), 412–429, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEB-08-2023-0076
  33. Úbeda-García, M., Claver-Cortés, E., Marco-Lajara, B., Zaragoza-Sáez, P., & García-Lillo, F. (2018). High performance work system and performance: Opening the black box through the organizational ambidexterity and human resource flexibility. Journal of Business Research, 88, 397-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.045.
  34. Van Den Hooff, B., & De Ridder, J. A. (2004). Knowledge sharing in context: the influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6), 117-130. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270410567675.
  35. Wiewiora, A., Trigunarsyah, B., Murphy, G., & Coffey, V. (2013). Organizational culture and willingness to share knowledge: A competing values perspective in Australian context. International journal of project management, 31(8), 1163-1174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.014.
  36. Yang, X., Pan, L., Song, A., Ma, X., & Yang, J. (2023). Research on the strategy of knowledge sharing among logistics enterprises under the goal of digital transformation. Heliyon, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15191.
  37. Zhao, R., Feng, N., Wei, F., & Wang, Y. (2023). Rewards and knowledge sharing in the CoPS development context: the moderating role of transformational leadership. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(5), 1228-1250. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2021-0780.


The Impact of High-Performance Work Systems on Employee Knowledge Sharing in Vietnam’s Logistics Industry

Abstract:

Purpose: This study aims to examine the effect of human resource management practices integrated within high-performance work systems on knowledge sharing behavior in the context of the Vietnamese logistics industry. 
Design/methodology/approach: A quantitative research design was employed using survey data collected from 782 employees working in logistics firms in Vietnam. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was applied to simultaneously assess the effects of multiple HRMPs on KS and to compare the differential impacts across specific HRMPs.
Findings: The findings suggest that different HRMPs influence KS to differing extents. Specifically, selective staffing, extensive training, employment security, incentive rewards, and employee participation have positive and statistically significant effects on KS behavior. In contrast, internal mobility, clear job descriptions, and results-oriented appraisal do not show significant effects. These results suggest that HPWS foster KS only when HRMPs are designed to create proximate conditions that directly enhance employees’ ability, motivation, and opportunity to share knowledge in their daily work. 
Originality/value: The findings provide empirical evidence that not all HRMPs embedded in HPWS operate through the same mechanisms to foster KS in Vietnam’s logistics sector. Instead, HPWS appears most consequential when HRMPs directly enhance employees’ ability, motivation, and opportunity to share knowledge.